Résultats de la recherche

1. Library Resource

   

   CPWF Medium Term Plan (2007-2009)

   Rapports et recherches

   juin, 2006

   Bangladesh, Bénin, Bhoutan, Botswana, Brésil, Burkina Faso, Cambodge, Chili, Chine, Colombie, Équateur, Égypte, Érythrée, Éthiopie, Ghana, Hongrie, Inde, Iran, Kenya, Laos, Mali, Mozambique, Népal, Niger, Nigéria, Pakistan, Pérou, Afrique du Sud, Soudan, Thaïlande, Ouganda, Viet Nam, Zimbabwe, Afrique occidentale, Afrique centrale, Amérique centrale, Amérique du Sud, Asie occidentale, Asie méridionale, Asia du sud-est

   Pâturages, terres arides et pastoralisme

   gestion des eaux

   parcours

   This introductory section covers the period since the submission of the last Mid-Term

   Plan until present, and concentrates on the following areas:

   > Principal areas of progress.

   > Developments in 2005 and early 2006.

   > Changes to the CPMT strategic plan.

   > Research achievement highlights.

   > Program progress.

   At this point – just under half way (two years and six months) in the implementation

   of the first CPWF phase (and three-and-a-half years since inception began)

2. Library Resource

   

   CPWF Annual Report 2005

   Rapports et recherches

   juin, 2006

   Bangladesh, Bhoutan, Burkina Faso, Cambodge, Tchad, Chili, Chine, Ghana, Honduras, Inde, Iran, Kenya, Laos, Mali, Népal, Niger, Nigéria, Pakistan, Pérou, Afrique du Sud, Soudan, Viet Nam, Zimbabwe, Colombie, Équateur, Érythrée, Éthiopie, Afrique centrale, Asie central, Afrique orientale, Amérique centrale, Amérique du Sud, Asie occidentale, Afrique septentrionale, Asie méridionale, Asia du sud-est, Afrique australe, Afrique occidentale

   gestion des eaux

   At this point – just under half way (two years and six months) in the implementation of the first CPWF phase (and three years and eight months since inception began) governance and management processes are running smoothly, it is in reasonable financial health and technical processes – such as issuing new calls and obtaining reviews by our Expert Panel on Scientific Quality – are familiar, although they must be adjusted to each specific instance.