Uganda and Tanzania approve EACOP oil pipeline despite environmental concerns | Land Portal
Author(s): 
Mike Mwenda
Language of the news reported: 
English

The governments of Uganda and Tanzania have officially approved the construction of the $5 billion East Africa Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) project, which is set to cover a distance of 1,443 kilometres. Uganda discovered commercial reserves of petroleum nearly two decades ago in one of the world’s most biodiverse regions, but production has been repeatedly delayed by a lack of infrastructure like a pipeline. Although the Ugandan authorities see the oil project as a major economic development, some environmentalists disagree, saying the fossil resources will lead to corruption and poverty.

Accusations of hypocrisy

Ugandan president Yoweri Museveni recently lambasted the West over what he called a “mockery” of Western commitments to climate targets and their promises to help boost African development. Recently, the European Union Parliament urged the international community to exert “maximum pressure” on Ugandan and Tanzanian authorities, as well as the project promoters and stakeholders, “to protect the environment and to put an end to the extractive activities in protected and sensitive ecosystems, including the shores of Lake Albert.”


Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni has pushed for a major new refinery project © UK foreign office/Flickr

“Out of the four oil fields, we started with smaller companies and subsequently got big firms like China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) and TotalEnergies. I particularly thank CNOOC because they are moving and I hope others are also moving. I want to thank the Chinese government for encouraging their company to come and invest here. We have been working with them since the 1950s in liberating our people and now we are in economic cooperation for mutual benefit. I also thank the government of France because I have not heard them making trouble apart from the European Parliament which I told to go to hell,” said Museveni.

Lawsuit dismissed

On Tuesday, 7 March a French court dismissed a case filed by six French and Ugandan environmental and human rights groups, who accused the French company TotalEnergies of not doing all it could to protect people and the local environment during the development of the Tilenga oil project and the East African Crude Oil Pipeline. Activists have expressed disappointment at the decision.


Climate activists expressed have expressed disappointment after a French court dismissed the lawsuit against the French Oil giant TotalEnergies © 350.org

Furthermore, plaintiffs argued that the pipeline project failed to adhere to the “Duty of Vigilance Act“, a 2017 French law that compels larger companies to avoid grave harm to human rights, health, safety and the environment. Unfortunately, the court dismissed the request to halt the EACOP, saying that only a judge examining the case in depth could assess whether the accusations against TotalEnergies were well founded before proceeding to an audit of operations on the ground. Some local media in Uganda have reported that companies have started moving equipment to the sites.

Uganda to proceed with oil pipeline deal despite backlash from activists


Commenting on the court ruling, African Institute for Energy Governance (AFIEGO) CEO Dickens Kamugisha stated his disappointment. “We had hoped that our case would be determined based on merits, not just technicalities that the court is using. The court would take into account this was the first case filed under a new law. It would come up with innovative ways of assuring that those who are coming to get justice, get justice. But when you make a decision of this nature, under a new law of this nature, you are almost telling everyone ‘please, don’t come.”

“Don’t fund EACOP”

Charity MigwiAfrica Regional Campaigner at 350.org, has called on banks to stop financing and facilitating the East African Crude Oil Pipeline. “SMBC, ICBC, and Standard Bank need to be sensitive to the needs of the communities and distance themselves from the project. Instead of supporting the EACOP project, which poses a threat to communities, the environment and the climate, financial institutions such as these can play a vital role in financing a just energy transition to renewable energy in the continent,” she said in an interview.


350.org campaigner Charity Migwi has urged banks to stop financing the EACOP project © 350.org

 

“It’s not too late because the project hasn’t secured all the funding required yet. These banks can still play a huge role in funding renewable energy projects. The alternative is funding renewable energy that would address the issue of energy poverty in Uganda and Tanzania, unlike EACOP, which would mainly serve the energy needs of the Global North,” Migwi concluded.

Presumably, there is a clear risk that the oil resources that should create wealth and stability for the Ugandan people will just cause corruption and poverty. Nigeria is a good example, but we must learn from prior mistakes to secure a better future.

 

Licenza Creative Commons

Copyright © Source (mentioned above). All rights reserved. The Land Portal distributes materials without the copyright owner’s permission based on the “fair use” doctrine of copyright, meaning that we post news articles for non-commercial, informative purposes. If you are the owner of the article or report and would like it to be removed, please contact us at hello@landportal.info and we will remove the posting immediately.

Various news items related to land governance are posted on the Land Portal every day by the Land Portal users, from various sources, such as news organizations and other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. The copyright lies with the source of the article; the Land Portal Foundation does not have the legal right to edit or correct the article, nor does the Foundation endorse its content. To make corrections or ask for permission to republish or other authorized use of this material, please contact the copyright holder.

Share this page